Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender IDAuthentication......?]

Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Thu Jun 16 10:56:20 UTC 2005


On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:32:31AM +0200,
 sthaug at nethelp.no <sthaug at nethelp.no> wrote 
 a message of 21 lines which said:

> The number of agreements needed in the email world is significantly
> higher than what is needed for BGP.

The proponents of "email peering" typically want to switch from the
current model (millions of independant email servers) to a different
model, with only a few big actors.

--
"Should anyone be allowed to operate an email system? Perhaps not."
Carl Hutzler
http://www.circleid.com/article/917_0_1_0_C/




More information about the NANOG mailing list