Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets

Lorenzo Colitti lorenzo at ripe.net
Thu Jun 9 15:24:00 UTC 2005


Jeroen Massar wrote:
> And it also makes clear why it didn't pop up in GRH, as when you insert
> the GRH ASN 8298 it won't be announced to GRH and thus it doesn't get
> detected and as quite a number of people check only there it can go
> quite unnoticed in the IPv6 tables...*

Actually, we never inserted AS8298 in any of the AS-sets we announced, 
so you should have seen them...

> Sidetracking: BGP should never accept a path from another peer
> containing the ASN of a directly connected peer... does it or not?

Hmm, I don't know. It wouldn't likely be selected as best path, of 
course, but why shouldn't it be accepted?


Regards,
Lorenzo

-- 
lorenzo at ripe.net                  colitti at dia.uniroma3.it
www.ripe.net                www.dia.uniroma3.it/~compunet
RIPE NCC        Roma Tre Computer Networks research group



More information about the NANOG mailing list