URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
Pete Templin
petelists at templin.org
Fri Jun 3 14:13:26 UTC 2005
will at loopfree.net wrote:
> This is new to me, but I haven't bought any new transit in the past 18 months -- is
> this common practice on multihomed BGP customers now? I could force things to work
> by always advertising all my prefixes out to them with the obvious downside of
> living in fear of my outbound traffic being dropped if I ever need to withdraw any
> of them.
I (a network much, much smaller than Sprint) do uRPF on all ports, but
also inform BGP customers (nine-page handoff documentation) that they
are uRPFed. However, in conjunction with community support for
adjusting localpref, we set a sufficient weight on the announcement so
that the edge node sees the customer link as preferred even if the rest
of our network doesn't, and therefore the uRPF check passes.
I don't think advertising more-specifics through other connections would
actually work, as the Sprint edge router would still want to reach the
more-specifics through the Sprint network, rather than the customer
link. It's all a matter of what the FIB says.
pt
More information about the NANOG
mailing list