NYSE Trading Halt Triggered by 'Network Storm'

Marshall Eubanks tme at multicasttech.com
Fri Jun 3 11:00:42 UTC 2005


On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:28:50 +0100
 christian.macnevin at uk.bnpparibas.com wrote:
> 
> Hm. It just sounds like a Tibco nack implosion to me.
> 
> 

I was wondering if this had anything to do with the common use of multicast to propagate
trading information...

Regards
Marshall


> 
> 
> 
> Internet
> jgrajewski at mandylionlabs.com@merit.edu - 02/06/2005 21:18
> 
> 
> Sent by:    owner-nanog at merit.edu
> 
> To:    fergdawg
> 
> cc:    nanog
> 
> 
> Subject:    Fwd: NYSE Trading Halt Triggered by 'Network Storm'
> 
> 
> 
> I dont want join the ranks of conspiracy theorists, but i must point
> out the coincidence that this minor digital "spanking" occurred exactly
> at the same time the NYSE members (folks whom own seats on the
> exchange) filed suit to block NYSE's proposed merger with electronic
> trading firm Archipelago Holdings Inc., saying the deal is unfair to
> exchange members.
> 
> The members feel the old "manual" way of doing trades (where they get a
> cut of every transaction) is best and that they dont need the
> electronic trading. ---   In fact one of their contentions is that the
> online system is not foolproof and prone to being compromised or
> disrupted by terrorists etc. ...and get this -- that they are the only
> ones -- in face to face trading -- that can give a "fair" transaction
> ---
> 
> here is the article on the members trying to block the merger:
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/09/
> AR2005050901325.html
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > Trading resumed normally at 9:30 a.m. Thursday.
> >
> > In a statement, the NYSE blamed the system failure, which suspended
> > trading at 3:56 p.m., on a communication problem. In an interview
> > Thursday with cable-news channel CNBC, NYSE CEO John Thain said the
> > problem was caused by a "network storm" in which "an error message was
> > created and then duplicated millions of times," overwhelming both the
> > system's primary and backup network routers.
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> > http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?
>  > articleID=163703141
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This message and any attachments (the "message") is 
> intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. 
> If you receive this message in error, please delete it and 
> immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
> its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole 
> or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet 
> can not guarantee the integrity of this message. 
> BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not 
> therefore be liable for the message if modified. 
> 
> **********************************************************************************************
> 
> BNP Paribas Private Bank London Branch is authorised 
> by CECEI & AMF and is regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority for the conduct of its investment business in the
> United Kingdom.
> 
> BNP Paribas Securities Services London Branch is authorised
> by CECEI & AMF and is regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority for the conduct of its investment business in the 
> United Kingdom.
>   
> BNP Paribas Fund Services UK Limited is authorised and 
> regulated by the Financial Services Authority.




More information about the NANOG mailing list