Verizon is easily fooled by spamming zombies
Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at ianai.net
Wed Jun 1 17:52:20 UTC 2005
On Jun 1, 2005, at 12:51 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
>> If the ISP wants to use SMTP AUTH or other mechanisms to lower abuse,
>> that's fine. But to say "only allow ISP.net from addresses - but
>> allow
>> them from anywhere on the 'Net" is kinda ... silly.
>>
>
> No, it makes perfect sense but that is the one thing I fear we'll have
> to agree to disagree on.
I fear you will have to agree to disagree with just about anyone who
runs a large mail server.
>> The solution presented here is not only not a solution, it is also a
>> problem.
>>
>
> Okay, then I suppose I don't understand the problem. How exactly do
> you
> mean?
1) It is not a solution because it does not stop spam. In fact, it
is easier to send spam through VZ's mail servers than just about
anyone else's.
2) It is a problem because they do not allow things almost every
other ISP does - things which are "standard" and things for which the
anti-spam community has been fighting to put in place for many years.
--
TTFN,
patrick
More information about the NANOG
mailing list