Vonage Selects TCS For VoIP E911 Service
Brad Knowles
brad at stop.mail-abuse.org
Wed Jul 20 11:27:24 UTC 2005
At 12:34 PM +0200 2005-07-20, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> So
> my guess is that the real drivers are the law enforcement agencies
> wanting to get better tracking abilities. Whether they get out of
> deal what they are hoping for remains to be seen. Not that they will
> tell us anyway.
Actually, the FBI has been at least somewhat open with their
disappointment of carrier support for position-enhanced information
and compliance with CALEA. I've seen recent articles in the press
that has made this obvious. It seems that the problem is that too
many people are holding onto their old phones, and the networks which
selected GPS as their solution aren't getting enough uptake fast
enough on the new position-enhanced models.
Contrary to my previous post, Nextel appears to be one of the
carriers that selected GPS, and Verizon and Sprint appear to have
done the same. AT&T, Cingular, and T-Mobile appear to have gone the
tower triangulation route.
But as far as E911 is concerned, the problem appears that many of
the emergency services providers still aren't equipped with the
necessary equipment -- the article at <http://tinyurl.com/dmzdq> is a
little old, but the situation was so bad at the time that I can't
imagine the entire world has been turned around since.
The whole CALEA/E911 issue was known a long time back. Even
_Wired_ picked up on it in early 1998, in the article at
<http://wired-vig.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,9502,00.html>, or
<http://www.danbrown.com/secrets/digital_fortress/cell_phones.html>.
And the interaction between VOIP, E911, and CALEA is still getting
some traction (see
<http://www.vonmag.com/issue/2005/jul/features/you_will_conform.htm>).
--
Brad Knowles, <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list