mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008)
Andre Oppermann
nanog-list at nrg4u.com
Thu Jul 7 19:41:37 UTC 2005
Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
>
> I'd have to counter with "the assumption that NATs are going
> away with v6 is a rather risky assumption." Or perhaps I
> misunderstood your point...
There is one thing often overlooked with regard to NAT. That is,
it has prevented many network based worms for millions of home
users behind NAT devices. Unfortunatly this fact is overlooked
all the time. NAT has its downsides but also upsides sometimes.
--
Andre
More information about the NANOG
mailing list