mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008)

Thu Jul 7 19:26:28 UTC 2005

Dave,

I'd have to counter with "the assumption that NATs are going
away with v6 is a rather risky assumption." Or perhaps I
misunderstood your point...

$.02,

- ferg

-- Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net> wrote:

[re: shim6]

the effort is relying on IPv6 and on the disappearance of NATs, for v6.  one 
might consider these to be critical dependencies that are rather risky.

--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg at netzero.net or fergdawg at sbcglobal.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/