OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
Edward Lewis
Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz
Wed Jul 6 17:55:43 UTC 2005
At 19:23 +0200 7/6/05, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
With the chicken little-ing again...
>You are approaching the problem at the wrong end by asking "what's in it for
>me to adopt IPv6 now". The real question is "is IPv6 inevitable in the long
>run".
Pardon my skepticism, but I recall hearing about the coming of the
world due to pollution in the 1970's and the end of the oil supply by
the 1980's. (E.g., see http://www.ncpa.org/pub/bg/bg159/ for a
discussion on the latter, albeit written before the most recent oil
'scare.')
The point isn't whether IPv6 is good or not - it's that long-range
predictions are often wrong. For every "memex"
(http://www.iath.virginia.edu/elab/hfl0051.html) there's an oil
crisis, Ada, GOSIP, economic default of New York City (Ford to City:
Drop Dead! - NY Daily News, Oct 30, 1975)...
>So by all means, be an IPv6 hold out as long as you like, but don't assume
>that just because adopting IPv6 doesn't make economic sense for you now, it
>isn't going to happen at some point in the next decade. No rush, though.
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0405/augmentation.html
Been there, done that, documented and shared results. (Yes, got the
T-Shirt too. It was a NANOG, after all.) That wasn't even the first
go-round I had with IPv6.
My experiences were that IPv6 was painful - I ran into a lot of
application bugs, OS's didn't deal with it well, and the ISP's were
tough to deal with - as in, not many suppliers, not enough expertise
to deliver on promises.
Maybe things are better now (note the use of past tense in the
previous paragraph), I don't deal with IPv6 at this time.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar
If you knew what I was thinking, you'd understand what I was saying.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list