The whole alternate-root ${STATE}horse
Todd Vierling
tv at duh.org
Wed Jul 6 11:50:59 UTC 2005
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote:
> > The reverse problem is more difficult to deal with -- that of
> > people wanting to access Chinese (or whatever) sites that can only be
> > found in the Chinese-owned alternative root.
>
> There was a time when email service was almost universally
> bundled with Internet access service. Nowadays it is
> quite common for people to get their email service from
> a different supplier than their access. There is no reason
> why DNS resolution could not similarly be unbundled from access.
1. Security ("man-in-the-middle").
2. Common interoperability.
3. *Common sense.* [Erm, oh yeah, perhaps I shouldn't feed the troll.
After all, this is the same guy who thinks that resurrecting the
long dead concept of source routed e-mail is scalable.]
You really should read RFC2826 sometime. It's quite short, as RFCs go.
> If the Internet is to become a global universal network then, by
> definition, it must become balkanized.
Fragmenting the namespace with "alternate" TLDs, breaking common
interoperability, is hardly a path to "universal." BZZZT, try again.
--
-- Todd Vierling <tv at duh.org> <tv at pobox.com> <todd at vierling.name>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list