OMB: IPv6 by June 2008

Sun Jul 3 15:45:12 UTC 2005

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:16:57 +0200, codewarrior at cuseeme.de said:
> On Jul 3, 2005, at 5:01 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 10:15:10 +0200, Peter Dambier said:
> >> People will want IPv9 with total gouvernement control. Especially  
> >> in China
> >> and the US.
> > The fact that something is neither available nor technically feasible has
> > never stopped people from wanting it...
> this was made as an example and would mean we are stuck here , aren t  
> we?

No, it means that we need to progress in directions that are available and
technically feasible.

I recently went to a car dealer *wanting* to spend $400 on a 2005 car that
got 4,000 miles to the gallon and guaranteed perfect safety in any conceivable
crash.  Of course, said car is neither available nor technically feasible.
That didn't stop the salesman and myself from coming to acceptable terms
on a slightly older Toyota Camry for slightly more money, said Camry being
both available and technically feasible... 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20050703/e53eda48/attachment.sig>