improving the registrar transfer process

Thornton thornton-nanog at cierragroup.com
Thu Jan 20 23:55:29 UTC 2005


On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 10:28 +1100, Bruce Tonkin wrote:

> Interestingly, the ICANN equivalent in Australia (auDA), does
> pro-actively enforce policies, and even took Capital Networks to court
> on the basis that they could be de-accredited as a registrar for .au, if
> they continued not to allow transfers for .com.
> 
> See:
> 
>     http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2004/324.html
> 
> The original judgment is at:
> 
>     http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/federal_ct/2004/808.html
> 
> 
yes they did. now pacnames in another country supposedly bought
capital...  at least they are allowing you to transfer away this time
though

auDA being proactive is good...now its time icann is...




More information about the NANOG mailing list