Association of Trustworthy Roots?

Mon Jan 17 03:22:17 UTC 2005

On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Chris Adams wrote:

>
> Once upon a time, Christopher L. Morrow <christopher.morrow at mci.com> said:
> > That process/procedure is in place for a good reason,
> > circumventing it will lead to problems in the long run. Do you circumvent
> > for MS, for AOL, for ATT? At what point do you draw the line? My home
> > business of pot painting?
>
> If the proper procedure was circumvented in the first place (which
> appears to be the case with panix.com), then it should be circumvented
> to repair the damage as fast as possible.

If it can be proven to have been cicumvented, sure. I don't think anything
beyond conjecture about that has been said 'publicly' yet, has it?