Proper authentication model
dgolding at burtongroup.com
Wed Jan 12 19:14:36 UTC 2005
On 1/12/05 12:05 PM, "Joe Abley" <jabley at isc.org> wrote:
> On 12 Jan 2005, at 11:53, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
>>> You mean you'd *request* a different path from different providers.
>> Provisioning a circuit from two different ^providers^, other than
>> your OC3 provider.
> I realise that's what you meant.
> My point was that competing, differently-named and
> organisationally-separate suppliers of network services frequently use
> common suppliers for metro fibre, long-haul transport, building access,
> etc. Just because you buy different services from different providers
> doesn't mean there will be no common points of failure.
Fate sharing is bad. The only way to be sure you aren't fate sharing is to
request GIS data from the carriers. And even that could be wrong...
More information about the NANOG