Proposed list charter/AUP change?

Steve Sobol sjsobol at
Wed Jan 5 23:03:05 UTC 2005

Hannigan, Martin wrote:

> To me, it's not a productive effort to micro-manage(or MERIT)
> the list via the FAQ. The FAQ is a traditional and 
> historically acceptable method of answering questions that are 
> bound to come up repeatedly as a primary result of new participants 
> from any source.

Micro-managing isn't a good idea, period. Having actual answers available in 
the FAQ *is* a good idea.

-- Internet & New Media Services,
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol at
PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
Apple Valley, California     Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.

More information about the NANOG mailing list