Proposed list charter/AUP change?
jb at jbacher.com
Tue Jan 4 19:29:07 UTC 2005
JC Dill wrote:
> For that reason, I believe that spam-related topics should be discussed
> on spam-l first, and then the topic should be raised on this list only
> if you can't find the info or contacts you need on the spam-specific
> list first.
> I think the NANOG FAQ should elaborate on this distinction.
From a KISS perspective, what denotes spam is, imho, off-topic for this
How to handle spam or the impact of spam is operational and is relevant
to this list regardless as to whether it's on spam-l or not.
More information about the NANOG