Proposed list charter/AUP change?

Jan Bacher jb at
Tue Jan 4 19:29:07 UTC 2005

JC Dill wrote:

> For that reason, I believe that spam-related topics should be discussed 
> on spam-l first, and then the topic should be raised on this list only 
> if you can't find the info or contacts you need on the spam-specific 
> list first.
> I think the NANOG FAQ should elaborate on this distinction.

 From a KISS perspective, what denotes spam is, imho, off-topic for this 

How to handle spam or the impact of spam is operational and is relevant 
to this list regardless as to whether it's on spam-l or not.

More information about the NANOG mailing list