Proposed list charter/AUP change?
billn at billn.net
Tue Jan 4 18:25:42 UTC 2005
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> Hi Bill, to be fair, there are specific forum for discussion of spam
> tackling measures and people have been pointed in that direction on
> numerous occasions, however in its generic sense it might still be on
> topic for nanog.
> I note the original post that sparked this (assuming i'm following these
> discussions correctly) was actually about abuse desks not spam specifically...
> So if the question is about anti-spam i think its OT, if its about abuse
> or a new spam technique then its probably of interest.
I would agree with this. I touched on that with mention of trojaned
sources, but perhaps I should have been more clear. Thanks for the
More information about the NANOG