AOL scomp
Edward B. Dreger
eddy+public+spam at noc.everquick.net
Thu Feb 24 19:08:07 UTC 2005
All,
Thanks for the many on- and off-list replies. Things begin to make a
bit more sense.
We recently began hosting a list with several AOL subscribers, and this
week's complaint volume is five times what it was last week. With one
complaint per ~4 AOL subscribers (who are but 4.6% of the total list)
this time around, and _zero_ complaints from anywhere else, I thought
something was amiss. 'tis a pity AOLers can't tell "delete" from
"unsubscribe" from spam.
Time to VERPify the list and unsubscribe people mercilessly. *grumble*
On the cynical side: Has anyone considered an "inverted" blacklist --
i.e., a _destination_-based mail blocking mechanism? Rejecting mail to
parties with excessive bogus complaint rates certainly might simplify
life for those tasked with handling "abuse" incidents. ;-)
On a more positive note: One AOL user unsubscribed correctly. I don't
mean to bash all AOLers... just the ones who are a bit... confused.
Thanks to all,
Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
________________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc at brics.com -*- jfconmaapaq at intc.net -*- sam at everquick.net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list