UN Panel Aims to End Internet Tug of War by July
Ross
rosshosman at spamarrest.com
Tue Feb 22 13:53:22 UTC 2005
No government will ever have the internet's best intrest in mind
when they talk about controlling it. Luckily government control
has been kept some what to a minimum so far but it's growing
rapidly and this is another attempt for a government body to
"control" the internet.
I wonder what new rules will be put in place if the ITU gets
control?
I also wonder if the ITU can really take control. What if the U.N.
says the ITU should run the TLD's and ICANN says no?
On Mon Feb 21 18:15:00 PST 2005, Joel Jaeggli <joelja
@darkwing.uoregon.edu=""> wrote:</joelja>
> When I hear Robert Mugabe talk about internet governance I
don't really
> get the impression that he has the interests of the people of
Zimbabwe at
> heart.
>
> joelja
>
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:45:12 -0500, Scott W Brim wrote:
>>> > I'm intrigued at the failure to distinguish
between the web and
>>> >
>>> > email, given that spam is a messaging
phenomenon, not a publishing
>>> > phenomenon.
>>> >
>>> It's actually a failure to distinguish the web from
the Internet
>>
>> i was probably too cryptic. yes, they are using the term
'web' to mean 'the internet'.
>>
>> the problem is that professional writing needs to be
careful, and a failure at such a basic level as using web to apply
to email does not bode well for the utility of the article...
>>
>>
>> d/
>> --
>> Dave Crocker
>> Brandenburg InternetWorking
>> +1.408.246.8253
>> dcrocker a t ...
>> WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
>>
>
> --
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting
joelja at darkwing.uoregon.edu
> GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000
35AB B67F 56B2
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list