#nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down

Wed Dec 21 20:30:18 UTC 2005

I'd like to see a useful #nanog where network operators could chat. I looked
around at the various IRC networks and freenode looks OK. They bind channels to
organizations, so #nanog could be bound to NANOG; this would allow the channel
to be rescued if it got lost. Does anyone agree that this would be a good idea?

Andrew Kirch wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>  
> william(at)elan.net wrote:
> 
> 
>>
>>I think you're confusing nanog-l with #nanog
>>