Let's talk about ICANN

Mon Dec 12 16:11:41 UTC 2005

At 7:56 -0800 12/12/05, william(at)elan.net wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
>
>>  I would think that ICANN is off topic for NANOG?
>
>Are you saying there is no operational impact in the decisions made by ICANN?

That's not how I read the comment.

The impact of ICANN on NANOG would be on topic.  A general "let's 
talk about ICANN" is best done in a forum designed for discussing 
ICANN.

It's not a sin to discuss ICANN on NANOG, but it's "barking up the 
wrong tree."  If anyone has any questions or concerns about any 
organization, go to an appropriate forum.  Don't talk about an 
organization (or person) behind its back.

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar

3 months to the next trip.  I guess it's finally time to settle down and
find a grocery store.