Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober)
Niels Bakker
niels=nanog at bakker.net
Thu Dec 8 11:16:36 UTC 2005
* Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com (Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com) [Thu 08 Dec 2005, 12:11 CET]:
>The RFC process itself is broken when clueless vendors treat RFCs as
>inviolable specs and implement according to the RFC even when they find
>flaws in it. If they want to remain true to the RFC process, they should
>not implement dumb things found in an RFC, instead they should write and
>submit a new RFC correcting the error and explaining the right way to do
>things.
Exactly. The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to
choose from! Why not add a few more?
-- Niels.
--
"Calling religion a drug is an insult to drugs everywhere.
Religion is more like the placebo of the masses."
-- MeFi user boaz
More information about the NANOG
mailing list