Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober)

Niels Bakker niels=nanog at bakker.net
Thu Dec 8 11:16:36 UTC 2005


* Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com (Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com) [Thu 08 Dec 2005, 12:11 CET]:
>The RFC process itself is broken when clueless vendors treat RFCs as 
>inviolable specs and implement according to the RFC even when they find 
>flaws in it. If they want to remain true to the RFC process, they should 
>not implement dumb things found in an RFC, instead they should write and 
>submit a new RFC correcting the error and explaining the right way to do 
>things.

Exactly.  The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to 
choose from!  Why not add a few more?


	-- Niels.

-- 
"Calling religion a drug is an insult to drugs everywhere. 
 Religion is more like the placebo of the masses."
			-- MeFi user boaz



More information about the NANOG mailing list