Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober)

Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Thu Dec 8 10:22:17 UTC 2005


> Perhaps DSNs should be sent to the original recipient, not the purported 

> sender.  RFC-compliant?  No.

The RFC process itself is broken when clueless vendors
treat RFCs as inviolable specs and implement according to
the RFC even when they find flaws in it. If they want to
remain true to the RFC process, they should not implement
dumb things found in an RFC, instead they should write and
submit a new RFC correcting the error and explaining the
right way to do things.

--Michael Dillon




More information about the NANOG mailing list