Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober)

Steven M. Bellovin smb at cs.columbia.edu
Mon Dec 5 04:04:52 UTC 2005


In message <B6621ED4D0AD394BBA73CA657DFD8976869630 at MSPEXBE01.wamnet.inc>, "Chur
ch, Chuck" writes:
>
>What about all the viruses out there that don't forge addresses?
>Sending a warning message makes sense for these.  Unless someone has
>done the research to determine the majority of viruses forge addresses,
>you really can't complain about the fact that the default is to warn.
>Calling vendors 'clueless' because a default doesn't match your needs is
>a little extreme, don't you think?  The ideal solution would be for the
>scanning software to send a warning only if the virus detected is known
>to use real addresses, otherwise it won't warn.
>

A-V companies are in the business of analyzing viruses.  They should 
*know* how a particular virus behaves.

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb





More information about the NANOG mailing list