Order of ASes in the BGP Path

Tue Aug 30 14:06:09 UTC 2005

### On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:02:18 +0100 (BST), "Stephen J. Wilcox"
### <steve at telecomplete.co.uk> casually decided to expound upon Abhishek
### Verma <abhishekv.verma at gmail.com> the following thoughts about "Re:
### Order of ASes in the BGP Path":

SJW> from time to time people say 'but the rfc says...'. but theres a big
SJW> place for precedent and common practice too.

True... but the latest BGP draft series attempts to address BCP and updates
on 1771.  Typically, the answers sought in light of current BGP practices
can be found in the draft.

--
/*===================[ Jake Khuon <khuon at NEEBU.Net> ]======================+
 | Packet Plumber, Network Engineers     /| / [~ [~ |) | | --------------- |
 | for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation  / |/  [_ [_ |) |_| N E T W O R K S |
 +=========================================================================*/