IPv6 Address Planning
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Thu Aug 11 07:44:44 UTC 2005
On 11-aug-2005, at 2:23, Kevin Loch wrote:
>> And on that vein perhaps it's prudent for people using network
>> prefixes longer than /64 to take care to ensure that the bit
>> positions
>> in the IPv6 address that should correspond to the u and g bits in the
>> modified EUI-64 interface ID (according to RFC 3513) are both set to
> Is there any known use for those bits?
The universal/local bit is copied from the EUI-64/MAC address and
flipped, and indicates whether the address is derived from something
(supposedly) globally unique or not. Both occur frequently, non-
unique stem from manual configuration or RFC 3041 temporary/privacy
addresses. The group bit isn't relevant, although you won't see MAC-
derived addresses with this bit set, of course.
There is no real reason to preserve these bits when the prefix length
is > 64.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list