Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control Internet
william(at)elan.net
william at elan.net
Fri Apr 29 11:45:34 UTC 2005
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote:
>> http://en.rian.ru/russia/20050428/39757635.html
>
> This makes Russia sound like some insane place where Big Brother
> spies on the communications of all citizens,
The changes there in last 4 years seem to be in that direction. Plus also
their system of people spying on their friends and co-workers (donosi)
was never fully dismantled and people involved were not banned from public
office and government like it happened in Chech and other Eastern European
countries.
> like in the United States.
Neither Russian nor US government announcements are good for Internet,
if it is to stay as means of international cooperation and unrestricted
information exchange.
> However, the last paragraph in the article makes Russia sound
> like a more sane place where people realize that the Internet
> doesn't need lots of special laws, rather like Canada.
Its not always about exact laws and in Russia laws are meant to be
"reinterpreted" (that is what Putin said :) by each court. In any case,
courts there are mostly controlled by executive branch (and so is
parliament as of year ago), the transition to democracy in Russia was
stopped half way in mid 90s and is now fully reversed in direction with
active and former KGB officers largely responsible for that.
Controlling the media is always important for totalitarian regime as
means of controlling the society at large. First most important media is
still TV and steps to control all national channels was first thing done
by Putin starting in 2001 and now TV is fully under governmental control
in Russia. Next most important media are newspapers and then Internet.
The attempts to control are being done by requiring all newspapers and all
internet media sites (!!!) to be registered with ministry of press (now
office in cultural ministry) and while its not all under control (yet),
the steps are being taken to restrict what newspapers say if they want to
keep being published. But latest trend of blogger sites are not subject
to media laws and that is why this new announcement of need to control
what is being said on the Internet is coming up now.
Frankly, I think they are too ambitious if they think they can actually
control the internet and what people in Russia can say (and same at even
stronger scale for US) - Internet there is not that of China and its too
difficult or too late to change developed infrastructure, so I believe
it'll most likely stay open as means of open personal communication exchange
and possibly 20-30 years from now that will be the decisive factor in
Russian government's downfall, but for right now its all going into the
direction of totalitarian regime, something like that of Chile in 1980s...
--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william at elan.net
More information about the NANOG
mailing list