PAIX Outages

Thu Apr 28 18:11:40 UTC 2005

In a message written on Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 01:51:54PM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> Personally I tend to suspect the general lack of uproar is a rather 
> unfortunate (for them) sign that PAIX is no longer relevant when it comes 
> to critical backbone infrastructures.

That, or a sign that operators are doing their job.  There should be
enough redundancy in the system that loss of any one site, for whatever
reason, doesn't cause a major, or even minor disruption.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20050428/8d5c095e/attachment.sig>