Internet2

Vicky Rode vickyr at socal.rr.com
Tue Apr 26 23:49:45 UTC 2005


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Maybe you should checkout some performance measurement numbers/papers
from ACM (www.acm.org) which should help answer some of your questions.
We are doing some interesting measurement research (qos related) and
unfortunately I don't have any data to share.

Then again, I'm not saying that Internet is going to crash and burn, its
doomed and that one should switch to I2. All I'm asking is for some
insight about potential risk of I2 abuse, that's all.

Not that this link answers your question, since you asked hopefully this
~ will keep you busy for few hours.

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/comp/net/wan-mon/netmon.html



regards,
/vicky

Randy Bush wrote:
|>Basically I meant to say not congested as the current Internet is.
|
|
| cool.  and your measurements of internet congestion are?  cites, please.
|
| randy
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCbtOZpbZvCIJx1bcRAkWTAKDgkf+gKJ4klHh/aVKJ9gh+9wQ58wCgvVG8
RBNfdo1cb3WdpZyUwBWauD8=
=I8AO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the NANOG mailing list