Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?

Tue Apr 19 16:11:55 UTC 2005

On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 15:47 +0000, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
> 
> Interesting thread on /. --
> 
> http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/198259&tid=95&tid=128&tid=4

The original poster doesn't identify what his starting TTL was before he
made his change.  I didn't read all the responses, but I can see how an
original 14 day TTL could take 4 weeks to propagate from master to end-
user, given the amount of testing he/she was doing *prior* to making the
change.

-Jim P.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20050419/2e58bcb9/attachment.sig>