Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...
Alex Rubenstein
alex at nac.net
Tue Apr 19 13:07:40 UTC 2005
> I personally still don't like the stability of SBC's PPPOE implementations
> and tunnels. I prefer Verizon's setup much more.
I am not sure what Verizon you are talking about, but the Verizon in my
area (aka Bell Atlantic, aka New Jersey Bell) (at least used to) have, for
some reason, have a cat 5000 in between us and the DSLAM. We see about 27
or so PVC's for the whole state. Verizon refers to these PVC's as PVC's to
each 'switch.' Conjecture is that there is some insane type of LANE and
god knows what going on. You run PPPOE over this, and in some limited
cases, it's stable.
Sprint (aka United Telephone) in our area (northern NJ), IMHO, does things
'right', or at least best of all the players we've dealt with through the
years. They provide a L2TP tunnel to you over an ATM-IP link, which the
other end of is on a Redback SMS of sorts. You see all of your clients as
PPPoEoL2TP. As hackery as it sounds, it works and is quite stable.
Yes, many LECs under your feet is interesting. Within 100 miles of our
office, we have more than I can even think of (Verizon-NJ Bell,
Verizon-NYNEX, Verizon-PA, Verizon-GTE, Sprint/United, Warwick Valley
Telephone, SBC-SNET, Citizens-Frontier, RCI-Frontier.
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex at nac.net, latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
More information about the NANOG
mailing list