AUP for NANOG?

Thu Apr 14 16:14:30 UTC 2005

I'm at a bit of a loss trying to understand how bashing other lists 
constitutes an improvement on bashing other members of the NANOG list.

I think the point of Matthew's email was that no one really cares for 
the bash fests, regardless of who it targets, be it on list, or off list.

Personally, having joined NANOG a couple of months ago, I've been much 
more taken aback by the amount of off topic griping about each other or 
about whoever decides whatever somewhere, than I have been impressed by 
the amount of useful information to be gleaned from people's posts.

I hadn't ever really planned on joining the post list to be able to send 
something to the list. I'm a little disappointed that my first urge to 
post has come from being tired of off-topic rants more than wanting to 
contribute something useful to the list.

Romain Komorn

Web Hosting Made Easy
http://www.Globat.com/

Randy Bush wrote:
>>>This reminds me of the way others behaved when I entered the field
>>>some 25 years ago. Some people were very helpful and friendly.
>>>Others responded very arrogantly with the tone of "how stupid you
>>>are for asking that question."
>>
>>I didn't know you read misc at openbsd.org or questions at freebsd.org
>>... :)
> 
> 
> you wanna see bad second grade playground behavior, try the
> asterisk mailing list.
> 
> randy
> 