Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation
Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
froomkin at law.miami.edu
Wed Apr 13 22:18:57 UTC 2005
Not so. The idea of an opposition party suggests the editors of ICW have
some desire to be in control. Not at all.
Further, we run a slash server. Most of the content is contributed. We
don't have to go hunt for it.
If ICANN ran decent discussion boards, it would put us out o business.
One can only hope and dream.
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Eric A. Hall wrote:
>
>
> On 4/13/2005 6:20 AM, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote:
>
>> ICANN is not perfect but it is hard to see anything
>> wrong with this particular action.
>
> what's got to be wrong about it? ICANNwatch is the unelected opposition
> party to ICANN's unelected majority party. Whatever ICANN does, ICANNwatch
> finds somebody who opposes it or comes out and opposes it themselves if
> they must, cause that's what opposition parties do. Being right or wrong
> or in the service of the community has nothing to do with it.
>
>
>
--
http://www.icannwatch.org Personal Blog: http://www.discourse.net
A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin at law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
-->It's cool here.<--
More information about the NANOG
mailing list