Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation

Wed Apr 13 20:50:19 UTC 2005

On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:24:13 PDT, Dave Crocker said:

(citing out of order to make a point...)

> The input turns out to be markedly minimal, where he comprises 25% of it.

Whether Karl is in fact right or a raving net.loon, there is indeed something very
wrong with the process if he's 25% of the input.

> He even cites the absence of protracted, public dialogue as 'proof' that input 
> is being ignored.

Exactly.  This is the Internet, remember?  Even a mostly-obvious statement like
"ISPs should prevent their customers from leaking rfc1918-sourced addresses" will
start a flamefest.  So the *lack* of a flame-fest regarding *any* action taken
by ICANN should tell you something about the perception of ICANN - even the
majority of net.loons have learned it's not worth the effort....

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20050413/9cbbfdc0/attachment.sig>