Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation

Wed Apr 13 16:24:13 UTC 2005

>  This is all a tempest in a teapot and it is all caused by a poor choice of
>  headings and seems to be a knee jerk reaction to several possible ways in
>  which the heading can be misunderstood.

Auerbach complains about ICANN.  

He challenges process rather than outcomes.

He even cites the absence of protracted, public dialogue as 'proof' that input 
is being ignored.  

The input turns out to be markedly minimal, where he comprises 25% of it.

An anti-ICANN website publishes it.

Why is it anyone thinks this sort of icann-bashing-as-usual, is somehow 
significant and worthy of burdening nanog?

  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net