djbdns: An alternative to BIND

Mon Apr 11 21:38:35 UTC 2005

if we still had moderation, i feel sure that i'd've been kicked off the
list by now for my attention to needless detail in this hairy thread.

"hit D now"

> So, I guess I'm wondering.... how is what BIND9 does substantially
> different than the case I've outlined above?

the modem vendors you were referring to believed that they were extending
the existing mo/dem specification.  authors of BIND9 and tinydns each believe 
that they are implementing what's written in RFC 1035.  so, different.
-- 
Paul Vixie