djbdns: An alternative to BIND
sthaug at nethelp.no
sthaug at nethelp.no
Sun Apr 10 05:34:18 UTC 2005
> You need only count the lines of code needed by the daemon/s
> servicing requests. That is, IMO, bind's only major failing. Too
> much code, too many little used features (nobody I know needs or
> wants rndc), and no way to compile without them. If you read Bruce
> Schneier, as every developer should, you know how important that
> "Amount of code" is.
Ah, but how do you know what are the little used features? We use rndc
a lot, just as we used ndc with BIND 8.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
More information about the NANOG
mailing list