djbdns: An alternative to BIND
Paul Wouters
paul at xtdnet.nl
Sat Apr 9 22:03:21 UTC 2005
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>> Just wondering how many have transitioned to djbdns from bind
>
> If transitioning from BIND, why go to the non-free and non-compliant
> djbdns instead of nsd (http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/)?
I couldn't agree more. At least BIND9 and NSD both support RFC 4035,
and I am getting tired of hearing about these cache poisoning hypes
lately.
Last one to secure his zone is a luser :)
Paul
More information about the NANOG
mailing list