[nanog] Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update
Ted Hardie
hardie at qualcomm.com
Thu Sep 23 23:27:53 UTC 2004
Note that draft-daigle-rfc954bis-01.txt was approved and is
sitting in the RFC Editor's queue. It removes all of the policy
language in RFC 954, but is otherwise the same (and it
will likewise be issued as a Draft Standard, the current
status of RFC 954).
regards,
Ted Hardie
At 6:00 PM -0400 9/23/04, Joe Abley wrote:
>On 23 Sep 2004, at 16:36, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>
>>http://rfc-ignorant.org/policy-ipwhois.php
>>
>>There you go. They do this, they're in violation of RFC 954.
>
>RFC 954 is a description of how one whois service, "running on the
>SRI-NIC machine (26.0.0.73 or 10.0.0.51)". How can any other whois
>service be in violation of that?
>
>
>Joe
More information about the NANOG
mailing list