APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update
Matt Ghali
mghali at gmail.com
Thu Sep 23 22:06:51 UTC 2004
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:56:42 -0400, Joe Abley <jabley at isc.org> wrote:
> The proposal (which comes from APNIC members, not from APNIC staff)
> concerns non-portable addresses assigned to end-users. I don't know
> about anybody else, but I've never had any luck getting a response from
> people in that category anyway; it's invariably the upstream ISPs who
> respond (if anybody does), and there is no suggestion that their
> contact details will be able to be hidden.
>
> So what difference will it make?
Effectively none.
APNIC has always served out unverified and obvious garbage from their
whois servers.
What I find offensive is that they are now codifying this lack of
cooperation, and tacit complicity with spammers and other anonymous
miscreants as official policy.
matto
More information about the NANOG
mailing list