who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]

Mon Nov 29 19:24:14 UTC 2004

On 29 Nov 2004, at 13:50, Owen DeLong wrote:

> Right... Well... The point of the loopback thingy was that you don't
> renumber the loopback.

This is not any kind of answer to the problem of TCP session 
survivability across renumbering events; it's an answer to the 
non-problem of TCP session survivability when there are no renumbering 
events.

> [how to suck eggs]

Joe