ULA and RIR cost-recovery

Sat Nov 27 13:42:55 UTC 2004

--On onsdag 24 november 2004 11.40 -0800 Tony Hain <alh-ietf at tndh.net>
wrote:

> The current problem is that the RIR membership has self-selected to a
> state where they set policies that ensure the end customer has no
> alternative except to be locked into their provider's address space.

Do note that, IIRC, RIPE had this up for discussion some time ago and opted
in-session for an "one AS -- one global prefix" solution which was then
overridden because APNIC and ARIN weren't as impressed by that solution. 

Don't blame Europe ;-) 
-- 
Måns Nilsson         Systems Specialist
+46 70 681 7204         KTHNOC
                        MN1334-RIPE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20041127/6005ae24/attachment.sig>