BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Sun Nov 28 18:45:54 UTC 2004



--On Sunday, November 28, 2004 1:21 PM +0100 Henning Brauer 
<hb-nanog at bsws.de> wrote:

>
> * Cliff Albert <cliff at oisec.net> [2004-11-28 13:13]:
>> Therefore I also agree with daniel that there is not really a problem
>> with the 1 ASN == 1 IPv6 Prefix.
>
> unless I miss something in that proposal that means that we'll see a
> dramatic increase in ASNs - I mean, it is not like only organizations
> with an ASN assigned have v4 space now. If they have their portable
> address space now, why should they suddenly accept that they had to
> renumber when changing providers?
>
Why should they go to v6 at all?

Owen


-- 
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20041128/23206632/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list