BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Sun Nov 28 18:45:12 UTC 2004


>
> My preference lies in making the policies a lot stricter, and actively
> verifying current delegations. I see a lot of ASN's requested just for
> fun with no real motive behind it.

I think this is already the case, at least with ARIN... I have definitely
had to thoroughly justify each and every ASN I have received from them in
the last 2 years (total of 6).  In fact, I think it was actually harder
to get an ASN than to get v4 prefixes in that same time period.

I think it is not unreasonable to work towards a policy of 1 AS gets
at least one IPv6 prefix and no AS can originate more than one prefix
longer than /32 (/33-/64).  I think that combined with the current
policies towards ASN issuance is probably reasonable routing table
size.

Owen


-- 
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20041128/63f6b7b4/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list