BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Sun Nov 28 13:26:17 UTC 2004
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> there are a lot of organizations now having PI without having an ASN
> and beeing multihomed. a transition to v6 with this policy would make
> things much worse for them, so why should they?
Agreed, but currently we are at "no PI for anybody but ISPs". How about
first solving the PI-denial problem for those who technically need it?
"Convenience PI holders" are a different problem space as you don't
have to account for routing in solving it.
> on the other hand, 1 ASN -> 1 v6 prefix does not necessarily mean 1 v6
> prefix -> 1 ASN. might work out.
Exactly.
Regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
More information about the NANOG
mailing list