BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32)

Fri Nov 26 09:29:21 UTC 2004

> Anyone starting out will be an end site, if that meant you could only
> ever be an end site then there'd be nothing but end sites. Skip to the
> not an end site section and meet those requirements instead.
>
Agreed... However, the letter of the law in the policy still should be
revisited to express that intent.

>> I think we definitely need
>> to review v6 allocation policy and improve its consistency and ability
>> to meet the needs of the community if v6 is to make real progress towards
>> broad adoption.
>
> I think working on the technical deficiences others have outlined
> would help more.
>
I don't think these are mutually exclusive.  I think IETF should work on the
technical deficiencies of the protocol.  I think the RIRs and ICANN should 
work
on the policy issues.  I see no reason those efforts can't proceed in
parallel.

Owen


-- 
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20041126/928debbe/attachment.sig>