ULA and RIR cost-recovery

Thu Nov 25 21:46:27 UTC 2004

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:09:02 EST, Daniel Senie said:
> Seems to me we wrote a document some years ago about how to address this. 
> If the upstream ISP isn't willing to filter at their edges, then write 
> contract language that the client is required to filter such traffic in 
> THEIR border routers. The typical customer with a few T-1 lines and some 
> small routers could easily afford the CPU power in their routers to 
> implement a few lines of ACL filtering.
> 
> This sure seems like a weak reason to scuttle an otherwise useful and 
> desired capability. 

Exactly.  And how many places *still* botch it in the IPv4 world?

And there's no reason I've seen that we should expect *any* different
in the IPv6 world....

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20041125/1c84ff71/attachment.sig>