who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]

Mon Nov 22 17:52:03 UTC 2004

> > none of those three things is acceptable, not even as a compromise.
> 
> The current solution I see for this is still IPv6. Except that one moves
> the complete 'Independence' problem a layer higher. Enter:
> 
> HIP: Host Identity Protocol:
> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/hip-charter.html

this level of complexity seems a little high for anything to be universal.
(let me put it this way: A6/DNAME was shot down because of complexity, and
it was simpler than this.)