who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]

Sun Nov 21 04:38:59 UTC 2004

> It seems easier to try to back-port SCTP's multihoming features to TCP
> somehow than to deploy an entirely new transport protocol.  It's
> unfortunate this wasn't addressed at the time IPng was being designed.

this was tried.  there was almost going to be a "TCP6" which was capable
of signalling an endpoint-renumber event using in-band control messages.
alas, this approach was deemed overly complex, so TCP went unchanged.
-- 
Paul Vixie