[nanog] RE: Stupid Ipv6 question...

Dan Mahoney, System Admin danm at prime.gushi.org
Fri Nov 19 19:12:07 UTC 2004


On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Scott Morris wrote:

No, nobody ever reads that tag.  It says "not to be removed except by the 
consumer".

Which with at least one severly drunk friend of mine, has meant that if 
you remove it, you have to eat it :)

-Dan


>
> Does that mean if we rip them off that we may be prosecuted?
>
> ;)
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu] On Behalf Of
> Kevin Loch
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:41 PM
> To: nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Stupid Ipv6 question...
>
>
> Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
>> With the exception of auto-configuration, I have yet to see any
>> IPv6 gear that cares about prefix length.  Configuring a /1 to a
>> /128 seems to work just fine.  If anyone knows of gear imposing
>> narrower limits on what can be configured I'd be facinated to know
>> about them.
>>
>
> 64 bit prefixes are the mattress tags of IPv6 interfaces.
>
> --
> Kevin Loch
>
>

--

"We need another cat.  This one's retarded."

-Cali, March 8, 2003 (3:43 AM)

--------Dan Mahoney--------
Techie,  Sysadmin,  WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144   AIM: LarpGM
Site:  http://www.gushi.org
---------------------------




More information about the NANOG mailing list